Brigade vs OpenClaw
Two open-source, self-hosted AI agents. One ships the org chart, memory, and connectors built in.
Brigade and OpenClaw are both MIT-licensed AI assistants you self-host on your own machine. The difference is what comes managed. OpenClaw gives you the primitives and leaves memory, integrations, and security for you to wire up. Brigade ships a crew of agents on a real org chart, Tideline long-term memory, 1,000+ Composio connectors, and five layers of security out of the box.
Choose Brigade if you want the org chart, managed memory, and connectors built in. Choose OpenClaw if you want a lean terminal assistant you assemble yourself.
Brigade vs OpenClaw, side by side
BrigadeWhere Brigade pulls ahead
A real org chart
Brigade routes goals to agents on an actual org chart that delegate and hand off. OpenClaw runs agents, but without goal-based routing or a chart.
Memory that is managed, not DIY
Tideline is a real memory graph with decay, trust, and poison resistance. OpenClaw's memory is an opt-in plugin you maintain yourself.
1,000+ connectors out of the box
Brigade ships 1,000+ managed Composio connectors. OpenClaw leaves you to wire up MCP servers and plugins.
One-click setup
Brigade launches in one click with nothing to host. OpenClaw needs a terminal, and WSL2 on Windows.
Where OpenClaw is a good pick
OpenClaw is a strong pick if you want a minimal, terminal-first assistant and prefer to assemble memory and integrations yourself. It is lean, fully open source, and self-hosted only, with no managed layer to depend on.
Frequently asked
Are Brigade and OpenClaw both open source?
- Yes. Both Brigade and OpenClaw are MIT licensed and free to self-host. The difference is what each ships managed: Brigade includes memory, connectors, and security layers, while OpenClaw provides the primitives for you to configure.
What does Brigade have that OpenClaw doesn't?
- Brigade adds a real org chart with goal-based routing, Tideline managed long-term memory, 1,000+ Composio connectors, self-improvement under your approval, five built-in security layers, and a switchable encrypted database. OpenClaw leaves most of those for you to wire up.
Is Brigade or OpenClaw easier to set up?
- Brigade is easier for most people: it launches in one click with nothing to host. OpenClaw is terminal-first and needs WSL2 on Windows. If you prefer assembling your own stack, OpenClaw's lean approach may suit you better.
Can I run both Brigade and OpenClaw locally?
- Yes. Both are self-hosted and run on your own machine, and both are model-agnostic, so they can use local models through Ollama as well as hosted providers. Your data and credentials stay with you in either case.
Try Brigade for free
Self-host the whole crew on your own machine. MIT licensed.
$ npm i @spinabot/brigadeGitHub